English
Received 16.06.2024, Revised 02.09.2024, Accepted 25.10.2024
The article explores the concept of university ecosystem marketing development in the context of modern global challenges, including globalization, digitalization, post-pandemic adaptation, and political and economic instability. The main problems affecting the competitiveness and sustainability of universities are identified, among which the outflow of intellectual potential, inequality in access to digital resources, and limited funding are particularly highlighted. The experience of leading world universities is analyzed, in particular the practices of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University, which are actively implementing digital platforms, micro-qualifications, innovative pedagogical approaches, and partnerships with business to ensure the quality of education and its global attractiveness. The article analyzes the role of digital tools in shaping the competitiveness of universities, in particular through the implementation of online platforms that ensure the accessibility of educational programs to a wide audience, reduce the digital divide, and stimulate international cooperation in the university ecosystem. Examples of successful partnerships between universities and businesses that promote investment attraction, development of innovative entrepreneurship and creation of innovative university infrastructure are considered. Strategies are proposed that promote equal access to education for socially vulnerable groups, a strategy for developing the marketing of the university ecosystem, which is formed on the basis of a digital educational environment, the development of adaptive educational programs, active partnership with business and the implementation of marketing campaigns aimed at popularizing the existing university innovation potential, are substantiated. As a result, it is noted that the implementation of these approaches will contribute to the transformation of universities into innovation centers capable of integrating into the global educational space, accumulating intellectual potential and contributing to the innovative sustainable development of society
innovative potential; innovation; investment; innovative entrepreneurship; innovation parks; intellectual capital; eco-territory; educational services; educational programs; sustainable development; technology transfer; innovation centers
[1] UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms?. Paris: UNESCO. doi: 10.54676/UZQV8501.
[2] OECD. (2024). Education at a Glance 2024: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD. doi: 10.1787/c00cad36-en.
[3] NAZYAVO. (2024). Report on the quality of higher education in Ukraine and its compliance with the tasks of sustainable innovative development of society in 2023. Kyiv: NAZYAVO.
[4] Restauri, S. (2023). Special edition: Post‑COVID online teaching and learning research outcomes. Journal of Educators Online, 20(2).
[5] Wilson, G., Johnson, O., & Brown, W. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on customer relationship management. Preprints. doi: 10.20944/preprints202408.0766.v1.
[6] De la Croix de Castries, J. (2017). Using artificial intelligence to enhance personalization of customer relationship management in the contact center space: Afiniti’s technology case study. (Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA).
[7] Allil, K. (2024). Integrating AI‑driven marketing analytics techniques into the classroom: Pedagogical strategies for enhancing student engagement and future business success. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12, 142-168. doi: 10.1057/s41270-023-00281-z.
[8] Wilson, G., Johnson, O., & Brown, W. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on customer relationship management. Preprints. doi: 10.20944/preprints202408.0766.v1.
[9] Gibbons, J. (2000). The role of Stanford University in fostering innovation and entrepreneurship. De Gruyter.
[10] Eesley, C.E., & Lee, Y.S. (2021). Do university entrepreneurship programs promote entrepreneurship? Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 833-861. doi: 10.1002/smj.3246.
[11] Lenoir, T., Rosenberg, N., & Rowen, H. (2003). Inventing the entrepreneurial university: Stanford and the co-evolution of Silicon Valley.
[12] Etzkowitz, H. (2013). StartX and the “paradox of success”: Filling the gap in Stanford’s entrepreneurial culture. Social Science Information, 52(4), 605-627. doi: 10.1177/0539018413498833.
[13] Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21, 5-27. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300175.
[14] Cremonini, L., & de Boer, H. (2018). Cooperating for world-class. Examples from the Netherlands. In Pursuit of world-class universities. A global experience (pp.1-18). New Delhi: Studera Press.
[15] Marginson, S. (2018). Global cooperation and national competition in the world-class university sector. In World-class universities (pp.13-53). Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004389632_002.
[16] Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., & Blois, G. (2018). Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.015.
[17] Staubitz, T., Resei, C., & Friedl, C. (2019). Microcredentials in EU and Global. Retrieved from https://www.corship.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Corship-R1.1c_micro-credentials.pdf.
[18] Jentzsch, T.H. (2023). Creating an inclusive community of practice with microcredentials. University of Delaware ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/4d00b8173d6c3ceec83a56cf64a4540e.
[19] Abelson, H., & Long, P.D. (2008). MIT's strategy for educational technology innovation, 1999-2003. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(6). doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2008.921609.
[20] Sheninger, E.C. (2014). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. California: Corwin Press.
[21] Hess, F.M., & Saxberg, B. (2013). Breakthrough leadership in the digital age: Using learning science to reboot schooling. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
[22] Thomas, S. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.
[23] Hoek, M. (2023). Tech for good: Imagine solving the world's greatest challenges. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis
[24] Betz, U.A.K., et al. (2023). Game changers in science and technology – now and beyond. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, article number 122588. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122588.
[25] Chui, M., Evers, M., Manyika, J., & Zheng, A. (2023). The bio revolution: Innovations transforming economies, societies, and our lives. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
[26] Simon, F., & Giovannetti, G. (2017). Managing biotechnology: From science to market in the digital age. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
[27] Frølund, L., Murray, F., & Riedel, M. (2017). Developing successful strategic partnerships with universities. Cambridge: MIT Sloan Management Review.
[28] Hasabnis, G. (2020). Research partnership between academic institutions and corporate sector. Journal of Global Economy, 16(2), 18-30. doi: 10.1956/jge.v16i2.652.
[29] Addanki, S. (2024). Dynamics of corporate entrepreneurship in technology companies: A study of strategic practices and governing frameworks shaping entrepreneurial ecosystems. (Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA).
[30] Heaton, S., Siegel, D.S., & Teece, D.J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4). doi: 10.1093/icc/dtz038.
[31] Cheng, K. (2012). Visibility of the MIT entrepreneurship ecosystem: MIT undergraduate awareness of on-campus entrepreneurship resources. (Bachelor's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA).
[32] Fishman, E.A., O'Shea, R.P., & Allen, T. (2014). Creating the MIT entrepreneurial ecosystem. In Building technology transfer within research universities: An enterpreneurial approach (pp. 60-75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[33] Boni, A., & Gunn, M. (2021). Building and leveraging the innovation ecosystem and clusters: Universities, startups, accelerators, alliances, and partnerships. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 26(1), 24-32. doi: 10.5912/jcb963.
[34] Budden, P., & Murray, F. (2018). An MIT framework for innovation ecosystem policy: Developing policies to support vibrant innovation ecosystems (iEcosystems). Working Paper.
[35] Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2023). MIT faculty annual report 2023. Retrieved from https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/156496/ChairOfTheFacultyannualreport-2023.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
[36] Stanford University. (2023). Stanford University enrollment reports.
[37] Faghri, A., & Bergman, T.L. (2024). Ranking academic institutions based on the productivity, impact, and quality of institutional scholars. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(3), 116-154. doi: 10.2478/jdis-2024-0017.
[38] Ferrary, M. (2023). Tacit knowledge transfer from academia to the regional industrial cluster through Ph.D. graduates’ mobility: The Stanford University case. In XXXII conference AIMS. Strasbourg, France.
[39] Jin, Y., Yuan, S., Shao, Zh., Hall, W., & Tang, J. (2021). Turing award elites revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact. Scientometrics, 126, 2329-2348. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03860-4.
[40] QS Quacquarelli Symonds. (2023). QS World University Rankings 2023: Employer reputation and graduate employment outcomes. Top Universities. https://www.topuniversities.com/world-university-rankings/2023.
[41] Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2023). MIT Career Advising and Professional Development (CAPD): Annual graduate employment report 2023. Retrieved from https://capd.mit.edu/.
[42] Stanford University. (2023). Stanford Career Education (BEAM): Graduate employment outcomes 2023. Retrieved from https://beam.stanford.edu/.
[43] Nuortimo, K. (2023). Bigdata based university reputation measurement. (Master’s thesis, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, France).
[44] Jin, Y., Yuan, S., Shao, Zh., Hall, W., & Tang, J. (2021). Turing award elites revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact. Scientometrics, 126, 2329-2348. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03860-4.
Українська