English
Received 10.03.2024, Revised 26.06.2024, Accepted 15.08.2024
In today's dynamic world, entrepreneurship has become an important engine of economic development and social change. In the conditions of globalization and rapid technological progress, traditional business models and strategies are gradually fading into the background, giving way to new approaches and innovations. The entrepreneurship ecosystem, consisting of diverse actors such as startups, investors, academic institutions and government bodies, is undergoing profound transformations that provide new opportunities and challenges for entrepreneurs. The purpose of the presented work is to determine the main features of the construction of a modern ecosystem in the conditions of innovative changes and the implementation of an innovative strategy. Methods used in the work: analysis method, synthesis method, induction method, deduction method, logical method, comparison method, generalization method, tabular method, graphic method. The research also revealed that innovative strategies that are actively implemented in this ecosystem have become critical for ensuring competitiveness and sustainable business development. They cover a variety of aspects, from the integration of the latest technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, to changing organizational structures and cultural approaches. These strategies allow not only to adapt to rapidly changing market conditions, but also to create new trends and opportunities. At the same time, innovative changes taking place within the entrepreneurial ecosystem are forming new paradigms for conducting business. They include social and environmental aspects affecting corporate responsibility and social inclusion. Organizational changes, such as the introduction of agile management methodologies and cross-functional teams, also play a key role in adapting enterprises to new challenges. Therefore, studying innovation strategies and changes in the entrepreneurial ecosystem is important for understanding how today's companies shape their future, adapt to challenges and take advantage of new opportunities. This analysis will allow a better understanding of what factors influence the development of entrepreneurship and how innovation can become a driving force for achieving success in today's economic environment
business; ecological entrepreneurship; ecosystem; entrepreneurship ecosystem; enterprise; competitiveness; sustainable development; development; development of entrepreneurship ecosystem; economic development; modern business development; innovative changes; strategies; innovative strategies
[1] Alekseieva, K., Maletych, M., Ptashchenko, O., Baranova, O., & Buryk, Z. (2023). State business support programs in wartime conditions. Economic Affairs, 68(01s), 231-242. doi: 10.46852/0424-2513.1s.2023.26.
[2] Gorokhova, T., et al. (2023). Circular economy as an alternative to the traditional linear economy: Case study of the EU. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 17(5), article number e03385. doi: 10.24857/rgsa.v17n5-00.
[3] Nyame-Asiamah, F., & Ghulam, S. (2019). The relationship between CSR activity and sales growth in the UK retailing sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(3), 387-401. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-09-2018-0245.
[4] Khaminich, S., Broshkov, M., Kuznietsov, E., Ptashchenko, O., Milcheva, V., & Boiko, O. (2019). Transformation of managerial innovations in conditions of digitalization of market relations. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), 7888-7893. doi: 10.35940/ijrte.D9137.118419.
[5] Li, L., Wang, S., Zeng, S., Ma, H., & Zheng, R. (2023). Unveiling the social responsibility factors in new infrastructure construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(4), 2272-2298. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2023-0305.
[6] Liakh, O., & Mucelli, A. (2023). Implications of COVID‑19 policies on the sustainable corporate practices of European firms. Kybernetes, 52(7), 2371-2394.
[7] Mair, J., & Marty, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.08.003.
[8] Reznikova, N. (2016). Ecological imperatives for extension of globalization processes: Problem of economic security. Investytsii: Practice and Experience, 21, 23-26.
[9] Reznikova, N., Ivashchenko, O., & Rubtsova, M. (2020). Global problems as a subject of interdisciplinary studies in the focus of international economic security and sustainable development. Economy and the State, 7, 24-31.
[10] Rubmann, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/engineered_products_project_business_indust474ry_4_future_productivity_growth_manufacturing_industries.aspx.
[11] Zaitsev, Y., Krysovatyy, I., Gavkalova, N., Sobko, O., & Boichyk, V. (2024). Interaction of digitization and corporate social responsibility in the context of sustainable development. Economic Affairs, 69, 217-227. doi: 10.46852/0424-2513.1.2024.23.
[12] Zhang, C., Mirza, S.S., Ahsan, T., & Usman, S.M. (2023). Corporate digitalization, managerial power distance and corporate sustainability performance: Evidence from China. Business Process Management Journal, 29(4), 1031-1056. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2022-0551.
[13] Zheng, T., Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., & Perona, M. (2021). The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 59(6), 1922-1954. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1824085.
[14] Horishna, N.M. (2016). The phenomenon of social entrepreneurship: Essence and criteria. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: Pedagogy & Social Work, 2(39).
[15] Kotler, F., & Li, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: How to do as much good as possible for your company and society (Translated by S. Yarynych). Kyiv: Standart.
[16] Krysovatyy, A.I., Sokhatska, O.M., Skavronska, I.V., et al. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: Changing directions of international investment flows. Ternopil: Osadtsa Yu.V.
[17] Krysovatyy, I.A. (2024). Modern market infrastructure of Ukraine. In II International scientific & practical Conference (pp. 87-88). Berlin, Germany.
[18] Krysovatyy, I.A. (2024). Entrepreneurial ecosystem: Blockchain technologies and digital inclusion. In Accounting-analytical and organizational-economic support for the development of the region (p. 235-238). Kyiv: Eastern Ukrainian National University named after V. Dal.
[19] Krysovatyy, I.A. (2023). Smart technologies as components of modern urban planning. Bulletin of the Eastern Ukrainian National University named after V. Dal, 4(280), 19-24. doi: 10.33216/1998-7927-2023-280-4-19-24.
[20] Paladiieva, Ya. (n.d.). Corporate social responsibility: What it means and why it matters. Retrieved from https://mbusinesspartner.com.ua/sotsialna-vidpovidalnist-bisnesu.
[21] Sobko, O., & Krysovatyy, I.A. (2021). Improving the management of innovative projects and revitalizing the innovative activity of Ukrainian enterprises. Bulletin of the Economy, 3, 97-112. doi: 10.35774/visnyk2021.03.084.
[22] Shaulska, L.V., & Kabachenko, H.S. (2016). Development of social entrepreneurship as a direction of state regulation of the labor market. Economics and Management Organization, 2(22), 300–310.
Українська