English
Received 03.12.2023, Revised 05.03.2024, Accepted 18.04.2024
Dynamic modeling of the shadow economy is becoming an integral part of modern economic analytics. It allows you to take into account the complex interrelationships and dynamics of the phenomenon of the shadow economy, which is critical for analyzing its impact on global financial and economic processes in the country and beyond. Using real-time data and intelligent algorithms helps identify changes and trends, which is key to predicting and managing in a changing economic environment. The purpose of this study is to consider and structure four types of dynamic mathematical models aimed at analyzing and forecasting the phenomena of the shadow economy of Ukraine in order to improve policies and management strategies aimed at reducing the negative impact of the phenomenon of informal economic activity on the economy of Ukraine and society. As a result of the research, the main methods of such dynamic models were considered: agent models (ABM), dynamic stochastic models of general equilibrium (DSGE), macroeconomic models, time series models; and how they relate to the shadow economy, and a comparative analysis of the application of these types of models to shadow economy simulations was conducted
shadow economy; mathematical modeling; dynamic models; econometric methods; time series
[1] Fève, P., Moura, A., & Pierrard, O. (2019). Shadow banking and financial regulation: A small-scale DSGE perspective. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 101, 130-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2019.02.001.
[2] Costa Junior, C.J., Garcia-Cintado, A.C., & Usabiaga, C. (2021). Fiscal adjustments and the shadow economy in an emerging market. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 25(7), 1666-1700. doi: 10.1017/S1365100519000828.
[3] Hokamp, S., & Seibold, G. (2014). How much rationality tolerates the shadow economy? – an agent-based econophysics approach. In B. Kamiński & G. Koloch (Eds.), Advances in social simulation. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 229, pp. 109-120). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_11.
[4] Dell’Anno, R., Gómez-Antonio, M., & Pardo, A. (2007). The shadow economy in three Mediterranean countries: France, Spain and Greece. A MIMIC approach. Empirical Economics, 33, 51-84. doi: 10.1007/s00181-006-0084-3.
[5] Dybka, P., et al. (2019). Currency demand and MIMIC models: Towards a structured hybrid method of measuring the shadow economy. International Tax and Public Finance, 26, 4-40. doi: 10.1007/s10797-018-9504-5.
[6] Gasparėnienė, L., Remeikienė, R., Ginevičius, R., & Schieg, M. (2018). Adoption of MIMIC model for estimation of digital shadow economy. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(4), 1453-1465. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2017.1342287.
[7] Boitan, I.A., & Ștefoni, S.E. (2023). Digitalization and the shadow economy: Impact assessment and policy implications for EU countries. Eastern European Economics, 61(2), 152-180. doi: 10.1080/00128775.2022.2102508.
[8] Alm, J., & Embaye, A. (2013). Using dynamic panel methods to estimate shadow economies around the world, 1984-2006. Public Finance Review, 41(5), 510-543. doi: 10.1177/1091142113482353.
[9] Miroshnychenko, H.O. (2011). Modeling the dynamic equilibrium of the economic system. Efektyvna ekonomika, 7.
[10] De Grauwe, P. (2010). The scientific foundation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. Public Choice, 144, 413-443. doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9674-x.
[11] Colacito, R., Engle, R.F., & Ghysels, E. (2011). A component model for dynamic correlations. Journal of Econometrics, 164(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.02.013
[12] Lukianenko, I.H. (2003). Dynamic macroeconomic models: A new conceptual approach. Kyiv: KM “Academia”.
Українська